Generate SEO Content Briefs in 30 Seconds — Free
AI-powered. Competitor-aware. Ahrefs-level depth. Exports to Markdown, ChatGPT prompts or your CMS. No signup. Forever free.
Here's an example brief for the keyword "best running shoes for flat feet" — your real brief below will look like this, populated with your keyword and competitors. Exports are disabled until you generate your own.
Content Score
Overall Content Score
- 85/100Outline Depth20%
Outline is solid (7 H2s) but guidance per section could be richer.
- 100/100Keyword Coverage15%
Strong keyword coverage — 12 LSI terms and 8 entities mapped.
- 80/100Entity Richness15%
8 entities is decent. Push past 10 to cement topical authority.
- 100/100Question Coverage15%
8 People-Also-Ask questions answered — strong PAA eligibility.
- 100/100Snippet Readiness15%
Clear paragraph snippet target with placement and format guidance — well-positioned.
- 100/100E-E-A-T Signals20%
7 concrete E-E-A-T signals — strong on credibility cues.
SERP Feature Opportunities
| Feature | Targetable? | How to target |
|---|---|---|
| Featured Snippet | Yes | Lead with a 45-60 word answer below the round-up H2. |
| People Also Ask | Yes | Answer each PAA question in 40-80 words within the FAQ block. |
| AI Overview | Yes | Commercial query with comparison intent — AI Overviews appear ~35% of the time. Front-load the recommendation. |
| Image Pack | Maybe | Original product photography with descriptive alt text increases image-pack eligibility. |
| Video | Maybe | A short on-foot review video embedded near the top adds video carousel eligibility. |
| Knowledge Panel | No | This is not a branded entity query — no knowledge panel. |
Topical Authority Radar
Strong primary-topic depth and question diversity. Below-average source density — add at least two peer-reviewed citations to lift this. Sub-topic breadth could expand to cover trail-running variants of flat-foot shoes.
Search Intent & SEO Copy
Competitor Analysis
Best Running Shoes 2026 | Runner's World UK
https://www.runnersworld.com/uk/gear/shoes
2,140 words
Best Running Shoes 2026 | Runner's World UK
https://www.runnersworld.com/uk/gear/shoes
Best Running Shoes 2026
- H2: How we test running shoes
- H2: Best running shoes for stability
- H3: Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24
- H3: ASICS Gel-Kayano 31
- H2: FAQ
10 Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet (2026) | RunRepeat
https://runrepeat.com/best-running-shoes-flat-feet
2,080 words
10 Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet (2026) | RunRepeat
https://runrepeat.com/best-running-shoes-flat-feet
10 Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet in 2026
- H2: Top 10 Stability Picks
- H3: Lab data: heel stack, drop, weight
- H2: How to choose
The Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet | WIRED
https://www.wired.com/story/best-running-shoes-flat-feet
1,620 words
The Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet | WIRED
https://www.wired.com/story/best-running-shoes-flat-feet
The Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
- H2: Our top pick
- H2: Runner-up
- H2: Budget pick
Competitor Gap Matrix
| Topic | runnersworld.com/uk | runrepeat.com | wired.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overpronation explainer | ✓ | ◐ | ✗ |
| Sizing & fit guidanceEasy win | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Wide-fit availability per model | ◐ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Plantar fasciitis link | ◐ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heel-to-toe drop guidance | ✓ | ✓ | ◐ |
| Budget pick under £100 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Outline
- H2
Why Flat Feet Need Specific Running Shoes
Explain overpronation in plain language. Cover injury risks (plantar fasciitis, shin splints, knee pain) flat-footed runners face in standard shoes. Set up why arch support and stability matter.
Target: ~250 words
- H2
How We Chose These Shoes
Brief methodology block — what we tested for, miles run, runner profiles consulted. Builds E-E-A-T.
Target: ~200 words
- H2
The 8 Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet in 2026
List intro. Hint at categories: best overall, best for long-distance, best budget, best for wide feet, etc.
Target: ~150 words
- H3
Best Overall — Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24
~200 words: pros, cons, who it's for, current UK RRP, link to retailer.
Target: ~200 words
- H3
Best for Long Distance — ASICS Gel-Kayano 31
Same structure as above.
Target: ~200 words
- H3
Best Budget Pick — Saucony Guide 17
Same structure. Highlight sub-£100 value.
Target: ~180 words
- H3
Best for Wide Feet — New Balance 860v14 (Wide Fit)
Same structure. Cover the wide-fit availability.
Target: ~180 words
- H2
What to Look For: Stability, Arch Support and Drop
Educational block — define stability, arch support, drop. Helps capture informational variants of the query.
Target: ~280 words
- H2
How to Get the Right Fit
Sizing tips, half-size up vs not, when to replace, how to break them in. Originally identified gap from competitor analysis.
Target: ~250 words
- H2
Frequently Asked Questions
4-6 FAQ blocks answering PAA-style questions in 40-80 words each.
Target: ~350 words
- H2
The Verdict — Which Pair Should You Buy?
Short conclusion repeating the best-overall pick and giving the next-best alternative based on price.
Target: ~160 words
Total target word count: 2,400 (sections sum to ~2,400)
Top-three competitors average 2,080 words. We recommend +15% (around 2,400) to expand the brand round-up and add a sizing/fit section all three missed.
Keyword Cluster
best running shoes for flat feet
People Also Ask
- Are stability shoes better for flat feet?
- What is the difference between motion-control and stability shoes?
- Can flat feet run long distances?
- How often should you replace running shoes for flat feet?
- Do you need orthotics if you have flat feet?
- Are Brooks or ASICS better for flat feet?
- What heel drop is best for flat feet?
- Can running fix flat feet?
Tip: answer each in 40-80 words for snippet eligibility. They don't all need a dedicated FAQ section — work them into the body where natural.
Featured Snippet & AI Overview
Featured snippet target
Format: Paragraph
Question: What are the best running shoes for flat feet?
Placement: Directly under the "The 8 Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet in 2026" H2.
Answer in 45-60 words, naming the top pick + the runner-up, and state the single biggest reason (typically guide-rail stability + medial post).
AI Overview optimisation
- Open the article with a one-paragraph answer to the head query — Google's AI Overview pulls a concise definitional opener far more often than mid-article prose.
- Name a specific best-overall pick within the first 200 words; AI Overviews prefer pages that commit to a recommendation rather than hedge.
- Include a comparison table with shoe name, price, weight and drop — tables are heavily favoured for AI Overview citations on commercial queries.
- Cite at least two authoritative sources (peer-reviewed gait studies or a podiatry association) — citations correlate strongly with AI Overview inclusion.
- Add a clearly-labelled FAQ block at the bottom; PAA-style answers feed AI Overview follow-ups.
Recommended Schema Markup
- ArticleCore schema for the editorial guide format.
- ItemListMark up the 8 shoes as an ordered list — earns rich list snippets on commercial queries.
- ProductFor each shoe block, basic Product schema with name and price band.
- FAQPageFor the FAQ section — earns accordion rich results.
- BreadcrumbListStandard breadcrumb markup for site hierarchy.
E-E-A-T Signals
- Add an author byline with credentials (e.g. "Reviewed by a UKA-licensed run coach").
- Photograph the shoes in your own studio rather than using brand stock images.
- State exact miles run in each pair during testing.
- Cite at least two peer-reviewed gait studies in the methodology section.
- Add a "Last updated: [date]" timestamp at the top — freshness is a trust signal on commercial guides.
- Disclose affiliate links explicitly in the methodology block.
- Link to a written reviews policy on a separate page.
Linking Suggestions
Internal links
- "how to choose running shoes for any foot type" → Running shoes guide pillar page
Distributes authority back to the head pillar; positions this article as a sub-topic.
- "preventing plantar fasciitis" → Plantar fasciitis treatment guide
Common comorbidity with flat feet — internal link captures readers researching the broader injury topic.
- "gait analysis at home" → DIY gait analysis post
Logical next step for readers diagnosing their pronation pattern themselves.
- "best socks for runners" → Running socks round-up
Adjacent commercial intent — surfaces another revenue page from this article.
External sources to cite
CTA Suggestions
- Mid-article
Not sure if you overpronate? Take our 60-second gait test →
- End-of-article
Get our best-overall pick at the lowest current UK price → Buy now
How to use this brief
Pick how you'll turn this brief into an article. Every workflow exports differently — and includes the steps that come next.
- 1. Open your editor (Google Docs / Notion / Word / Obsidian).
- 2. Paste the outline. Each H2/H3 becomes a section heading.
- 3. Write to the suggested word count for each section. Use the People-Also-Ask card as your fact-checking list.
Why content briefs matter (and why most people skip them)
The article that ranks #1 wasn't written better than the article at #14. It was briefed better. The structure was decided before anyone opened a doc, intent was matched up front, competitor gaps were mapped, and every section had a job. The writer wrote into a plan instead of guessing their way through a topic.
Skipping the brief is the single most expensive habit in content marketing. Articles drift off-intent, paragraphs repeat themselves, sections that should rank for a specific question end up burying it. The writer rewrites. The editor rewrites again. The article eventually ships at half the quality it could have hit, three weeks late.
A good brief cuts writing time by 40-60%, lifts the article's rank potential, and turns the writer's job from "research and write" into "write" — which is what writers are good at. This tool exists because for most people the cost of a £35-£99/month brief tool is the barrier, not the value of the brief itself. Use it free; ship better articles.
How to use a content brief in 3 steps
The brief is the start of the workflow — these are the next steps that actually ship the article.
Plan
Define your keyword and target. Use the brief to align on intent before anyone writes a word.
Write
Hand the brief to a writer, draft with AI, or write it yourself. The structure is locked; the voice is yours.
Measure
Publish, monitor rankings in 2-4 weeks, iterate on the headings and snippet sections.
How we compare to Frase, Surfer and MarketMuse
An honest table. Not a marketing one.
| Feature | SEO First Web | Frase | Surfer | MarketMuse |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-generated brief | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor analysis (1-3 URLs) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Content Score | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SERP Feature matrix | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Topical Authority radar | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| AI mega-prompt export | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Writer handoff doc | ✓ | Partial | ✗ | Partial |
| Price | Free | £35/mo | £59/mo | £99+/mo |
We don't claim to replace these tools at scale — they have research databases, content scoring against live SERP data, and team features we don't. But for solo SEOs, small agencies and learners, our brief delivers ~80% of the value at 0% of the cost.
Glossary
The SEO terms used by this tool. Click to expand any definition.
AI Overview
Google's AI-generated summary at the very top of certain SERPs. Now appears on around 20% of queries. Pages cited in the AI Overview attract clicks even when ranking below the organic top three.
Content Score
Our 0-100 score measuring how thorough a brief is across six dimensions: outline depth, keyword coverage, entity richness, question coverage, snippet readiness and E-E-A-T signals.
E-E-A-T
Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness. Google's quality framework for evaluating content, especially on Your Money or Your Life (YMYL) topics like health and finance.
Entity
A specific named thing — a brand, a place, a person, a concept — that Google's Knowledge Graph understands. Pages that mention many related entities are read as comprehensive on a topic.
Featured Snippet
The boxed answer at the top of some Google results — also called "position zero". Captures around 8% of clicks on the SERP, often pulling traffic from organic positions 2-5.
LSI Keywords
Latent Semantic Indexing keywords — terms semantically related to your primary keyword. Modern Google calls these "co-occurrence terms". Including them signals that your page is genuinely about the topic.
People Also Ask (PAA)
The expandable question boxes Google shows on most SERPs. Answering these cleanly within your article makes you eligible to appear inside them.
Schema Markup
Structured data tags (typically JSON-LD) that help Google understand what your page is — not just what it says. Unlocks rich results like star ratings, FAQ accordions and recipe cards.
Search Intent
The reason a user typed a query. Informational, commercial, transactional or navigational. Match intent or rank nowhere — it is the single biggest factor most SEOs underweight.
SERP
Search Engine Results Page — what Google shows when someone searches. Modern SERPs blend organic results, ads, SERP features and AI Overviews.
Topical Authority
Google's measure of how comprehensive a site is on a topic. Built by covering not just the head keyword but the surrounding entities, subtopics and questions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this tool really free?
Yes. No sign-up, no card, no email harvesting. We pay for the Gemini calls because a useful free tool means the people who eventually contact us about consultancy arrive better informed — those conversations are worth more to us than a list of email addresses. The only ceiling is Google's shared 1,500-requests-per-day free tier. When that runs out we offer a free consultation instead.
How is this different from ChatGPT or an AI article writer?
A brief is a plan, not a draft. ChatGPT will happily write a 2,000-word article in five seconds, but it has no idea what your competitors are covering, what the SERP rewards for that keyword, or what entities Google expects to see. This tool fetches your top 3 competitors, identifies their gaps, scores topical authority on six dimensions, and gives you the plan to write something that actually ranks. The writing comes after — and you can use our AI mega-prompt to hand the plan straight to ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini if you want.
Can I trust the competitor analysis?
We fetch the URLs you provide server-side, parse the rendered HTML, and extract titles, meta descriptions, headings, schema types and an estimated word count. Many sites (especially Cloudflare-fronted ones) block automated requests — if that happens, that competitor is marked failed and the brief still generates from the others. We never store the fetched content.
How accurate is the Content Score?
The score is computed deterministically from six measurable dimensions: outline depth, keyword coverage, entity richness, question coverage, snippet readiness and E-E-A-T signals. It predicts how thorough your brief is — not whether the resulting article will rank, which also depends on link authority, freshness, and on-page execution. Briefs scoring 85+ tend to produce articles that rank in the top 10 with proper execution.
What's the difference between Beginner and Pro mode?
Beginner mode shows tooltips on every input, expands "Why this matters" explainers on every result card, and collapses the advanced settings behind a click. Pro mode hides the explainers, surfaces every config knob, and assumes you know what LSI keywords and E-E-A-T are. Switch any time — your preference persists across visits.
Why do I need to provide competitor URLs?
You don't — the brief generates fine without them. But the SERP's top results are the best evidence of what Google currently rewards for your keyword. With 1-3 competitor URLs we can identify topics they covered (replicate or beat), gaps they all missed (your easiest wins) and the SERP's expected content depth.
Will the AI hallucinate or make things up?
Gemini occasionally invents specifics — a study that doesn't exist, a statistic that's wrong, a competitor strength that's overstated. Treat every concrete factual claim as a hypothesis you fact-check before publishing. The brief's structure (outline, LSI, entities, intent) is reliable; specific numbers and named studies are not.
Do I still need a writer?
Depends on your stack. A solo SEO with strong domain knowledge can write from this brief in 4-6 hours. An agency briefing freelance writers should use the "Hand to a writer" export which builds a project doc with metadata, due-date placeholder and delivery instructions. Pure AI-generated articles (no human editing) consistently underperform — Google's March 2024 helpful-content update made that clear.
How is this different from Frase, Surfer or MarketMuse?
They charge £35-£99/month and have their own research databases that pull from live SERP data — capabilities we honestly don't replicate at scale. For solo SEOs, small agencies and learners, our brief delivers around 80% of the same value at 0% of the cost. If you're publishing 50+ articles a month you'll outgrow us; if you're publishing 5, you genuinely don't need to pay.
Can I use this for non-English content?
The tool will run for any language Gemini supports, but it is optimised for English (with UK English as default). Outputs in other languages may need more local editing. We do not yet support multilingual generation as a single workflow.
Other Free SEO Tools
Title & Meta Generator
Generate 5 alternative SEO titles & metas — pixel-width scored, paste-instructions included.
Open tool →Advanced Schema Builder
Build the structured data we recommended — Article, FAQPage, HowTo, Product and more.
Open tool →Need this done across 50 articles?
Briefing one article is fast. Briefing 50 across a content calendar with keyword research, intent mapping and a topical-authority memo is a project — and it is exactly what the consultancy does. Free 30-minute call to see if we are a fit.
Book a Free Consultation